Same area, similar budget — compared line by line by Henry Tan, IQI
| CloutHaus | Jewel by Oxley Tower | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | RM 1.48M | RM 1.57M |
| Price range | RM 1.48M – RM 4.25M | RM 1.57M – RM 5.11M |
| Built-up | 549–1,216 sq ft | 678–2,185 sq ft |
| Bedrooms | 1–3 | 1–4 |
| Tenure | Freehold | Freehold |
| Total units | 615 | 267 |
| Density | medium | low |
| Completion | 2029 | 2026 |
| Maintenance | RM 0.80 psf | RM 0.60 psf |
Think twice if: Avoid if buyer prioritises stable rental yield.
“Ultra-prime KLCC positioning built around branding, hospitality appeal, and investor prestige rather than defensive fundamentals.” — Henry
Think twice if: Avoid if buyer prioritises cashflow efficiency.
“Luxury KLCC investor product leaning heavily on branding and international buyer psychology rather than rental fundamentals.” — Henry
CloutHaus has the lower entry at RM 1.48M versus Jewel by Oxley Tower at RM 1.57M. Both are in KLCC; pricing moves with package updates, so confirm the latest figures with Henry.
Jewel by Oxley Tower is targeted earlier (2026 vs 2029). Dates are indicative until the developer confirms.
For CloutHaus: Strong rental demand from KLCC corporate tenants; premium psf positioning For Jewel by Oxley Tower: Strong demand for KLCC branded residences Weigh the entry gap (RM 1.48M vs RM 1.57M) against realistic rental for KLCC before deciding.
Usually yes — both are in KLCC. Message Henry on WhatsApp and he'll line up back-to-back viewings and the current price lists for both.
Browsing preferences cleared.
You can edit or remove anything before sending.